--- title: "Introduction to heter_endo_gmm in order to estimate heterogeneous peer effect when identity equals eligibility" output: rmarkdown::html_vignette vignette: > %\VignetteIndexEntry{Introduction to two_step_gmm in order to estimate heterogeneous peer effect} %\VignetteEngine{knitr::rmarkdown} %\VignetteEncoding{UTF-8} --- ```{r, include = FALSE} knitr::opts_chunk$set( collapse = TRUE, comment = "#>" ) ``` ```{r setup} library(heterogeneouspeereffects) ``` # Heterogeneous Peer Effects The package **"Heterogeneous Peer Effects"** aims to estimate individual responses within groups. Our contribution to the standard linear-in-means model is that we allow individuals to respond differently to the outcomes of their peers depending on both their **identity** and **eligibility** for treatment. - **Identity** refers to an observable characteristic of an individual (e.g., race, gender). - **Eligibility** indicates whether an individual is allowed to receive the treatment. In the function `heter_endo_gmm`, we assume that identity and eligibility coincide, meaning that eligibility is determined by identity (e.g., being Black or White). Specifically, we distinguish between: - **Within-group peer effects** (*theta within*): interactions between individuals sharing the same identity. - **Between-group peer effects** (*theta between*): interactions between individuals of different identities. We propose a simple methodology to identify and estimate the model using **partial population experiments**, where only a subset of individuals within a group is eligible for treatment, and the proportion of eligible individuals varies across groups. The estimation procedure relies on the **Generalized Method of Moments (GMM)**. --- ## Assumptions Our method is based on the following key assumptions: 1. **Linear-in-Means Model with Panel Data** - The outcome depends linearly on both the average outcome and the treatment status. 2. **Treatment Distribution Assumption** - For each observed share of eligible individuals in the population, there exist both treated and control groups. 3. **Conditional Common Trends** - In the absence of treatment, the average change in aggregate outcomes among eligible individuals in treated groups would have been the same as in control groups. 4. **Stable Share of Eligibles** - The proportion of eligible individuals within a group remains constant over time. --- ## Data Requirements To apply this methodology, the data must meet the following criteria: - Each group (e.g., districts) must contain both **Eligible** and **Non-Eligible** individuals. - Groups must be categorized as either **Treated** or **Non-Treated**. - Example: In analyzing the impact of **Rosenwald schools** on school attendance: - **Eligible individuals** = Black residents - **Non-Eligible individuals** = White residents - **Treated groups** = Districts that received Rosenwald schools The analysis is conducted at an **aggregate level**, considering average outcomes within each group. --- ## Estimation Procedure To estimate the model, the following variables are required: - `s` : Proportion of eligible individuals in the group (vector) - `YN` : Average outcome for **non-eligible** individuals in the group (vector) - `YE` : Average outcome for **eligible** individuals in the group (vector) - `D` : Binary treatment indicator for the group (vector) - `n_param` : Number of parameters to estimate (`=5` by default or `=3` for a restricted model) --- ## Usage Examples ### Estimating `delta`, `theta_within`, and `theta_between` with 5 parameters: ```r # Run estimation with default parameters (5 parameters) test_nocov <- heter_endo_gmm(YE, YN, D, s) # View results print(test_nocov) ``` ### Estimating with a 3-parameter model: ```r # Run estimation with 3 parameters test_bis <- heter_endo_gmm(YE, YN, D, s, n_param = 3) ``` --- ### Outcomes This package return the estimated coefficients (and their p_values of ): - direct effect of treatment (delta) - intra group effect of treatment (theta_within) - inter group effect of treatment (theta_between) --- This package provides a flexible and robust framework for estimating heterogeneous peer effects in grouped data, making it applicable to various empirical settings, such as education, labor markets, and social networks.