After fitting bpgmm, posterior samples can be inspected
through chain-level summaries, trace plots, and co-clustering
probabilities. These diagnostics complement the model-selection
example.
The chains below are deliberately short so that the vignette builds quickly. Applied analyses should use longer chains and examine stability across independent runs.
library(bpgmm)
set.seed(2029)
X <- cbind(
matrix(rnorm(10, mean = -2.0, sd = 0.25), nrow = 2),
matrix(rnorm(10, mean = 0.0, sd = 0.25), nrow = 2),
matrix(rnorm(10, mean = 2.0, sd = 0.25), nrow = 2)
)
known_labels <- rep(1:3, each = 5)cluster_cols <- c("#0072B2", "#D55E00", "#009E73", "#CC79A7")
plot(
X[1, ], X[2, ],
col = cluster_cols[known_labels],
pch = 19,
xlab = "Variable 1",
ylab = "Variable 2",
main = "Diagnostic example",
asp = 1
)pgmm_rjmcmc_chains() runs independent chains. The
vignette uses cores = 1 for CRAN portability, but users can
increase cores locally.
For chain \(c\), simple empirical summaries are
\[ \widehat{p}_c(m = r \mid X) = \frac{1}{S_c}\sum_{s=1}^{S_c} I(m_c^{(s)} = r), \qquad \widehat{p}_c(v = a \mid X) = \frac{1}{S_c}\sum_{s=1}^{S_c} I(v_c^{(s)} = a). \]
Large disagreements across chains are a warning sign, especially when the chains use different random seeds.
chain_summaries <- lapply(fits, summarize_pgmm_rjmcmc, true_cluster = known_labels)
data.frame(
chain = names(chain_summaries),
ari = vapply(chain_summaries, function(x) x$ari, numeric(1)),
modal_clusters = vapply(chain_summaries, function(x) {
as.integer(names(which.max(x$n_clusters)))
}, integer(1))
)
#> chain ari modal_clusters
#> chain_1 chain_1 1.00 3
#> chain_2 chain_2 0.16 3The posterior samples store the active cluster indicators and covariance constraint at each saved iteration. These traces are first diagnostics.
cluster_count_trace <- function(fit) {
vapply(fit$active_cluster_samples, sum, numeric(1))
}
constraint_trace <- function(fit) {
vapply(fit$constraint_samples, constraint_to_model, character(1))
}
cluster_traces <- lapply(fits, cluster_count_trace)
constraint_traces <- lapply(fits, constraint_trace)
cluster_traces
#> $chain_1
#> [1] 3 3 3 3
#>
#> $chain_2
#> [1] 3 3 3 3
constraint_traces
#> $chain_1
#> [1] "UUU" "CUU" "CUC" "CCC"
#>
#> $chain_2
#> [1] "UUU" "UCU" "UCC" "UCC"old_par <- par(mar = c(4, 4, 3, 1))
plot(
cluster_traces[[1]],
type = "b",
pch = 19,
ylim = range(unlist(cluster_traces)),
col = "#0072B2",
xlab = "Saved iteration",
ylab = "Active clusters",
main = "Cluster-count trace"
)
lines(cluster_traces[[2]], type = "b", pch = 19, col = "#D55E00")
legend("topright", legend = names(fits), col = c("#0072B2", "#D55E00"), lty = 1, pch = 19, bty = "n")A co-clustering matrix estimates how often two observations are assigned to the same cluster across posterior samples. It reports pairwise uncertainty rather than only a single modal allocation.
\[ C_{ij} = \Pr(z_i = z_j \mid X) \approx \frac{1}{S}\sum_{s=1}^{S} I\{z_i^{(s)} = z_j^{(s)}\}. \]
co_clustering_matrix <- function(fit) {
n <- length(fit$allocation_samples[[1]])
out <- matrix(0, n, n)
for (allocation in fit$allocation_samples) {
out <- out + outer(allocation, allocation, "==")
}
out / length(fit$allocation_samples)
}
co_mat <- co_clustering_matrix(fits[[1]])
round(co_mat[1:6, 1:6], 2)
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6]
#> [1,] 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25
#> [2,] 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25
#> [3,] 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25
#> [4,] 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25
#> [5,] 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25
#> [6,] 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00image(
seq_len(nrow(co_mat)),
seq_len(ncol(co_mat)),
co_mat[nrow(co_mat):1, ],
col = hcl.colors(20, "YlGnBu", rev = TRUE),
xlab = "Observation",
ylab = "Observation",
main = "Posterior co-clustering"
)Warning signs include:
m_range;v_step = 1;q_new, or
m_range.These diagnostics do not replace a long MCMC analysis, but they give a concise description of the posterior output.